When taking the MBTA (Massachusetts Bar Exam) test, you will likely be asked multiple choice questions concerning cars. These can range from questions about practical driving skills to questions about your knowledge of cars in general. The key to answering these questions correctly is a good understanding of how cars work. This is the key to success on the MBTA! Here’s what you need to know about understanding cars and why it’s important to get a good grasp of how cars make sense.
One of the most common question types in the MBTA tests concerns strategies. In this section, you’ll be asked to identify a number of strategies that you can employ to solve a particular problem. For instance, you might be asked to analyze the ways in which different cars handle turns at a single point in time https://emcexoticrentals.com/ . Or you might be asked to examine the strategies that would be best for driving in a variety of situations, such as a drive through a city or an off-road highway. The key to answering these questions is to develop a specific strategy and then analyze the consequences of that strategy in light of your experience with driving in real-life situations.
Another type of MBTA strategy questions involves reasoning by example. In this paragraph, you’ll be asked to analyze the reasoning behind a specific piece of information presented to you in the paragraph above. For instance, you might analyze how a driver might respond to a given situation by first considering the factors that cause the event to occur, then considering the ways in which a driver can adjust their behavior based on those causes. Finally, you’ll analyze the results of that adjustment in terms of what caused the car to lose traction and end up in a stationary position.
One type of MBTA strategy question revolves around developing a main idea. You’ll likely be asked to identify an overarching “theme” or central idea behind all the various facts and figures you have observed in the passage so far. The purpose is to show your readers that all the facts and figures you have collected so far are related to one central idea. For instance, if you’ve noticed that in a series of cars accidents one driver was speeding, another was driving at a reasonable speed, and another was traveling slower than usual, there might be a main idea or theme here involving speeding drivers or slow cars. The point is not to analyze each detail individually, but to construct your argument from a collection of related ideas. This strategy helps middle schoolers to develop a generalization or framework around the main idea.
Another popular MBTA strategy involves developing an analogy or visual image from the passage to support your point. An example might be that in the third paragraph, we said that some drivers, especially new ones, get so frustrated that they begin to impatience other drivers on the road. Some of my students have done just that in response to this passage. They say things like, “The red car keeps moving forward, but the driver in the left lane keeps putting his foot down.” In their next paragraph, they say that the red car has traveled farther than the vehicle in the left lane because it stopped at a red light before it passed the red light, whereas the third vehicle in the left lane also stopped at the red light before proceeding.
In this next paragraph, the students draw a line from the first paragraph to the second, saying that if the vehicle in the third paragraph didn’t slow down at the stop light, it must have been a deliberate action. They then draw a line from the second paragraph to the third, saying that if the driver in the third paragraph continued to accelerate, it must have been a mistake. Now these examples might seem a bit rhetorical to students unfamiliar with this strategy, but they’re actually a very good illustration of how the main idea is intertwined with many details, many of which do not affect the main idea itself. In fact, I often find myself having to explain the way this strategy is applied, since it’s used so often. (In fact, one of my students explained this to me when she had a paper due the following week and was having trouble understanding it.) Here’s a closer example.
In the third paragraph of the previous paragraph, we wrote that a van driver saw four children swarming on the sidewalk across the street. The fourth child, a girl, ran from the crowd without looking back, crossing the street in front of the van. The driver saw her fall to the ground and saw the girl start to run again. He says that he saw her feet hit the pavement. In the third paragraph, we said that the van driver saw the girl running without looking back and did not slow down. Is this a mcat cars strategy?
In fact, this is a common situation that teachers and educators face, particularly when dealing with a complicated topic like cars. Sometimes the topic at hand is not easily solved, but solutions are possible. In the middle schooler’s case, though, the teacher’s main point is the meaning of the passage as quoted above. There are details to be worked out, and some interpretation needed. In order to facilitate learning, the passage should be presented in the same manner as if it were given to an adult reader.